Legal Opinion

California v. United States

District Court, N.D. California

Decided June 1, 1966No. Civ. 43057PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Per curiam

The Interstate Commerce Commission permitted the Union Pacific Railroad Company to discontinue the “City of St. Louis,” a passenger train operating between Los Angeles, California, and Ogden, Utah, and to make compensating changes in the schedule of the “City of Los Angeles,” a similar Union Pacific train operating between the same points.

The Public Utilities Commission of the State of California asks us to annul the Commission’s order. We think “there is warrant in the law and the facts for what the Commission has done” (United States v. Pierce Auto Lines, 327 U.S. 515, 536, 66 S.Ct. 687,…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. United States v. American Trucking AssociationsSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
  2. United States v. Pierce Auto Freight Lines, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1946
  3. Southern Railway Co. v. North CarolinaSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  4. Brown Telecasters, Inc. v. Federal Communications Commission, Television Broadcasters, Inc., IntervenorCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1961

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. City of Chicago v. United StatesDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1969
  2. City of Williamsport v. United StatesDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1968
  3. City of Chicago v. United StatesDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1969
  4. Anderson v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 1969

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API