Legal Opinion

Johnson v. Dunn

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided March 26, 1928No. 4830PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtT. Bailey Lee, J.

This is a suit to quiet title to an irregular strip of land lying between the resurveyed north boundary line of lots 2, 3, 4 and 5, section 9, township 9 south of range 15 E. B. M., and the rimrock of Snake River. As shown by the original field-notes and plat of the 1881 government survey, these lots extended to the south bank of Snake River, the meander line closely following the contour of the river along the rimrock, and no land being shown between the rimrock and the river, whereas there was in fact a considerable body of such land. This survey was approved in 1884; and in August, 1907,…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. United States v. State Investment Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1924
  2. Lee Wilson & Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1917
  3. Russell v. Maxwell Land Grant Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1895
  4. Jorgensen v. McAllisterIdaho Supreme Court · 1921
  5. Stroup v. MatthewsIdaho Supreme Court · 1927

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Pointner v. JohnsonIdaho Supreme Court · 1985
  2. Rich v. BurdickIdaho Supreme Court · 1961
  3. Palmer v. FitzpatrickIdaho Supreme Court · 1976
  4. Cramer v. DriesbachIdaho Supreme Court · 1955
  5. Smith v. LongIdaho Supreme Court · 1952

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API