Wear v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
WOOLLEY, Circuit Judge.
William Potter, the decedent, was donee of a general power of appointment under the will of his father. He exercised the power in his own will by giving the property to his two daughters who, had he omitted to exercise it, would have taken the property under the will of their grandfather, the donor, and the decedent’s estate would to that extent have escaped a federal tax. As the decedent did, as a matter of fact, exercise the power, the Commissioner of Internal Revenue imposed upon his estate a tax measured by the value of the property passing under the power, on…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Burnet v. HarmelSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
- Knowlton v. MooreSupreme Court of the United States · 1900
- Chase National Bank v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1929
- Tyler v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1930
- Chanler v. KelseySupreme Court of the United States · 1907
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Legg's Estate v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1940
- Rothensies v. Fidelity-Philadelphia Trust Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1940
- Lewis v. RothensiesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1943
- Grinnell v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1934
- Keating v. MayerDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1955
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.