Hand in Hand Building & Loan Ass'n v. Deery
Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County
1Opinion of the Court
MacNeille, J.,
In this case a petition was filed and a rule granted against defendant to show cause why the satisfaction of a mortgage improperly entered should not be stricken from the records. The defendant now asks that this petition be stricken off, to*636gether with plaintiff’s rule, on the ground that the petition cannot be employed to initiate such a proceeding.
Plaintiff cites, as his authority to use the petition for an original process, Seigler v. Ripple, 16 Lanc. 237, Orlovsky et al. v. Atkinson et al., 15 D. & C. 648, and In re Meloy Mortgage, 8 Dist. R. 364, in all of which similar…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Delco Ice Manufacturing Co. v. Frick Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1935
- Fleming v. ParrySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1854
- Erie County v. LambertonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1929
- Quin v. CallahanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1889
- Brown v. HenrySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1884
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.