Legal Opinion
Kennedy v. City of White Bear Lake
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
Decided February 18, 1930No. 8545PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
REEVES, District Judge.
Appellants were plaintiffs and the appellee was defendant in the trial court. These designations will he used in this opinion.
Plaintiffs seek the rescission of a contract for the construction of a sewerage system for defendant.
In July, 1926, the plaintiff Kennedy, with the corporate plaintiff as surety, entered into said contract with the defendant city. It was provided, among other things, that if quicksand should be encountered in making excavations for said system, the same should either be removed as extra work, or that a special allowance should be made to cover…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- United States v. GleasonSupreme Court of the United States · 1900
- Bijur Motor Lighting Co. v. Eclipse Mach. Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1917
- Brookheim v. GreenbaumCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1915
- Alexander v. RedmondCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1910
- Hyman v. Trow Directory Printing & Bookbinding Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1919
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- McCullough v. Clinch-Mitchell Const. Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1934
- Karn v. AndresenCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1932
- Hudspeth v. Esso Standard Oil Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1948
- Tobin Quarries, Inc. v. Central Nebraska Public Power & Irrigation Dist.District Court, D. Nebraska · 1946