Legal Opinion · Dissent

Keigans v. State

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided June 15, 1906Published

This case was decided by Division B. Writ of error to the Circuit Court for Pasco County. The facts in the case are stated in the opinion of the Court.

1DissentShackleford, C. J.

(dissenting) : I regret exceedingly that I am unable to concur in the opinion which has been prepared in this case by Mr. Justice Parkhill and in which Presiding Justice Taylor and Mr. Justice Hocker have concurred. Actuated by a conscientious desire to reach a like conclusion with them if possible and wishing to have the benefit of all the light which could be shed upon the matters discussed in the opinion, I have availed-myself of the privilege conferred by Section 2 of Chapter 5124, Laws of 1903, and have procured the record, assignment of errors and briefs of the respective counsel, and…

2Cases cited81 opinions

  1. Mathis v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1903
  2. Lester v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1896
  3. Kearney v. SnodgrassOregon Supreme Court · 1885
  4. Terry v. BuffingtonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1852
  5. Watrous v. MorrisonSupreme Court of Florida · 1894

76 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API