Legal Opinion

People v. Radz

California Court of Appeal

Decided December 28, 1931No. Docket No. 2146PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BISHOP, J., pro tem.

On this appeal from a judgment, following his conviction of robbery in the first degree, and from the order denying his motion for a new trial, appellant presents but two points for our consideration. The first, that the evidence is insufficient, is fully disposed of by noting the testimony of the service station attendant. He stated that he was robbed at the point of a gun by two men, one masked and one unmasked, at 10:30 P. M. on April 28th. The service station where the robbery occurred was brilliantly lighted; the men were at their work of opening the till and…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. People v. BuckleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
  2. Albert v. McKay & Co.California Supreme Court · 1917
  3. People v. LedbetterCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1930

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. People v. PaysenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1932
  2. People v. RichardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1951
  3. People v. LoarCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1958
  4. People v. CovingtonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1932
  5. People v. JohnsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1937

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API