Legal Opinion
Aaron v. Logro Corp.
District Court of Appeal of Florida
Decided August 5, 1969No. 69-123PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BARKDULL, Judge.
Appellants, plaintiffs in the trial court, appeal an adverse summary judgment wherein the trial court held, as a matter of law, the defendants were not guilty of negligence in maintaining a parking lot or that the injured plaintiff was guilty of contributory negligence in tripping over a concrete divider placed thereon. We affirm.
The parking lot in question was provided for the patrons of a restaurant and was so arranged that the automobiles were parked at an angle and parallel to each other. The injured party was a passenger seated in the right front seat. Upon alighting from…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Matson v. Tip Top Grocery Company, Inc.Supreme Court of Florida · 1942
- Bowles v. Elkes Pontiac Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 1953
- Wilkins v. Allied Stores of MissouriSupreme Court of Missouri · 1958
- McMullan v. the Kroger Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1951
- Brooks v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1939
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Ramsey v. Home Depot U.S.A., Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2013
- Green House, Inc. v. ThiermannDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1974
- Mershon v. Gino's, Inc.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1971
- Evans v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1974
- Aaron v. Logro Corp.Supreme Court of Florida · 1970
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.