Legal Opinion

Ex Parte Deramus

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided July 2, 1998No. 1970596PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Martin Eric Deramus was convicted of trafficking in cocaine and was sentenced to 20 years' imprisonment. Deramus appealed, arguing that his conviction was void because, he contended, the jury that convicted him was not properly sworn. Although the circuit clerk administered an oath to the jury venire, the record does not indicate that the trial court administered an oath to the petit jury that was selected and empaneled to hear his case or reminded the jurors that they were still under oath, as required by Ala. Code 1975, § 12-16-170, 1 and Rule 18.5, Ala.R.Crim.P.2 The Court of Criminal…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Batson v. State Ex Rel. DavisSupreme Court of Alabama · 1927
  2. Tarver v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1986
  3. Ex Parte TarverSupreme Court of Alabama · 1986
  4. Porter v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1987
  5. Marks v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1991

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Ex Parte BordenSupreme Court of Alabama · 2000
  2. Parris v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 2003
  3. Brooks v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 2002
  4. Ex Parte BenfordSupreme Court of Alabama · 2006
  5. Nix v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 2001

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API