Legal Opinion

Williams v. Kelley

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided November 26, 1934No. 4307PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HALL, Chief Justice.

Kelley sued Williams, alleging, in his original petition, in substance that Williams had employed him to plow certain lands belonging to Williams and to rod weed it twice and sow said land to wheat in the fall of 1933, agreeing to pay $462 for the plowing, $308 for rod weeding, and $154 for sowing; that Williams breached his contract and refused to let him do the work, although he was ready, willing, and able and offered to do it; that the reasonable expenses incident to doing the work would have been $260; that by reason of Williams’ breach of the contract, he has been…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Pecos & Northern Texas Railway Co. v. RayzorTexas Supreme Court · 1915
  2. Associated Indemnity Corp. v. BakerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1934
  3. Texas Employers Ins. Assn. v. EvansTexas Supreme Court · 1927
  4. Holsomback v. TaylorCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1933
  5. Tallabas v. Wing ChongCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1934

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Southern Rock Island Plow Co. v. WilliamsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1934
  2. Watson v. WhittonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1940
  3. Independent Life Ins. Co. of America v. EdenCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1936

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API