Kingsland v. Metropolitan Life Insurance
Montana Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Matthews
The defendant, Metropolitan Life Insurance Company, has appealed from a judgment against it and in favor of Christina Kingsland, beneficiary under two policies of life insurance issued to her husband, Alvin Kingsland, deceased.
The policies which form the basis of the judgment were originally straight life insurance policies, but in 1929, prior to the death of the insured, the company added to all such policies a rider supplementing the benefits thereof as follows:
“Upon receipt of due proof that the insured * * * has sustained * * * bodily injuries, solely through external, violent and…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Freeman v. Mercantile Mutual Accident Ass'nMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1892
- Leland v. Order of United Commercial Travelers of AmericaMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1919
- Moffett v. Bozeman Canning Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1933
- Commercial Travelers' Mut. Acc. Ass'n v. FultonCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1897
- Sullivan v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceMontana Supreme Court · 1934
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Evans v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceWashington Supreme Court · 1946
- Mahon v. American Cas. Co. of ReadingNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1961
- Kundiger v. Metropolitan Life Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1944
- Life Insurance Co. of North America v. EvansMontana Supreme Court · 1981
- Doettl v. Colonial Life & Accident InsuranceDistrict Court, D. Montana · 1982
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.