Legal Opinion

Folts v. Ferguson

Texas Supreme Court

Decided May 13, 1890No. 6642Published

Appeal from Shackelford. Tried below before Hon. J. C. Randolph.

1Opinion

ON MOTION FOR REHEARING.

Douglas & Lanier and L. W. Campbell, on motion for rehearing. rehearing.— The point made in the first ground for rehearing was not raised in the court below nor in the briefs and assignments of error in this court. But if the law is as we understand it to have been "construed by the decisions of this court since the trial below, this being a question of law, may now be properly applied to this case on rehearing. We contend that though the

*306allegations, of defendants’ answer may be true, still they fail to show the State had a judgment lien on the land, because Haskell…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Miller v. KoertgeTexas Supreme Court · 1888
  2. O'Shea v. TwohigTexas Supreme Court · 1852
  3. Clark v. GossTexas Supreme Court · 1854
  4. Baker v. BeckTexas Supreme Court · 1889
  5. Wilson v. CatchingsTexas Supreme Court · 1874

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API