Legal Opinion

Miller v. Koertge

Texas Supreme Court

Decided March 6, 1888No. 2565PublishedCited by 21 opinions

Appeal from Harris. Tried below before the Hon. James Masterson.

1Opinion of the Court

Gaines, Associate Justice.

At a sheriff’s sale, made by\; virtue of an execution in favor of the State of Texas against, , Charles Koertge, the appellant Miller became the purchaser of' , the lands in controversy in this suit. The sale was made on ithe first Tuesday in March, 1885. The title to the lands was originally in Charles Koertge, but Herman Koertge, his son, claimed to have purchased them for a valuable consideration , before the sale and before the levy of the execution. Appellant having obtained a judgment in a suit of forcible entry and im-j lawful detainer, the other parties to…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Thornburgh v. HandCalifornia Supreme Court · 1857
  2. Fox v. WillisMichigan Supreme Court · 1849
  3. Jones v. RahillySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1871
  4. Pearson v. HudsonTexas Supreme Court · 1879
  5. Judge v. VogelMichigan Supreme Court · 1878

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Davis v. HoweTexas Commission of Appeals · 1919
  2. Weaver v. NugentTexas Supreme Court · 1888
  3. Moore v. MillerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1913
  4. John Hancock Mutual Life Insurance v. MorseTexas Supreme Court · 1939
  5. Dittman v. Weiss Bros.Texas Supreme Court · 1895

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API