McClung v. Pratt
Washington Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
Donworthth, J. —
These three cases consolidated by stipulation of the parties are before us on a short récord pursuant to Rule on Appeal 34 (3), 34A Wn. (2d) 36.
■ Appellants’ concise statement of points relied upon is sufficient to comply with Rule 34 (3), supra. However, to avoid any misunderstanding as to the exact question involved in these appeals, we restate it as follows:
Are the nonresident owner and his nonresident employee-driver of a motor truck engaged in hauling household goods in this state solely in interstate commerce amenable to our workmen’s compensation act?
If the answer to…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- State Ex Rel. Washington Motor Coach Co. v. KellyWashington Supreme Court · 1937
3Cited by4 opinions
- Hammack v. Monroe Street Lumber Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1956
- MSM Hauling, Inc. v. Department of Labor & IndustriesWashington Supreme Court · 1989
- Burns v. Transcon LinesNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1979
- Burns v. Transcon LinesNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1979