Legal Opinion
Romanchuk v. Murphy
New York Supreme Court
Decided March 21, 1951PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtValente, J.
The petitioner brings this proceeding under article 78 of the Civil Practice Act to compel the respondents comprising the municipal civil service commission to cancel their revocation of the certification of the petitioner for appointment as policewoman, to compel the respondent police commissioner to reinstate her to the position of policewoman and to compel the respondents comptroller of the City of New York and treasurer of the City of New York to take the necessary steps to pay her the salary of such position during the period since her removal from her position.
The essential facts are…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- People Ex Rel. Finnegan v. . McBrideNew York Court of Appeals · 1919
- Matter of Wolff v. HodsonNew York Court of Appeals · 1941
- Peo. Ex Rel. Hannan v. . Board of HealthNew York Court of Appeals · 1897
- Matter of Kaney v. New York State Civil Service Comm.New York Court of Appeals · 1948
- Kaney v. New York State Civil Service CommissionAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1948
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Vega v. Civil Service Commission, City of New YorkDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1974
- Perotta v. GregoryNew York Supreme Court · 1957
- People Ex Rel. Krich v. HurleyAppellate Court of Illinois · 1958
- Faulisi v. Board of Police CommissionersNew York Supreme Court · 1957
- Cyzowski v. PostonNew York Supreme Court · 1969
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.