Pomper v. Superior Court
California Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtWilbur, C. J.
This is a proceeding on certiorari to review an order of the respondent court granting a new trial in the action of Pomper v. Beknke. The application is based upon the claim that the judgment rendered in the action, upon which the motion for a new trial was based, was an interlocutory and not a final judgment, and for that reason it is claimed the court had no jurisdiction to grant the motion for a new trial, which is only appropriate, it is claimed, after the entry of the final judgment in the action. The respondent claims that the judgment rendered by the trial court was a final judgment,…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Doudell v. ShooCalifornia Supreme Court · 1911
- California National Bank v. StatelerSupreme Court of the United States · 1898
- Clement v. DuncanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1923
3Cited by15 opinions
- Gunder v. GunderCalifornia Supreme Court · 1929
- Middleton v. FinneyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1931
- Wesley N. Taylor Co. v. RussellCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1961
- Hughes v. DemundCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1929
- White v. WhiteCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1938
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.