Legal Opinion

People v. Hendricks

District Court, Virgin Islands

Decided October 30, 1929No. 143PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtWilliams, Judge

In view of the zeal and insistency shown by counsel for defendant at the hearing on the motion for a new trial, I feel it is not amiss to record my views on the question presented. It is conceded by the defendant that both Alexander Hendricks and Joseph Knight are roustabouts, or what is commonly called in this community vagabonds. This concession is sustained by their record in the courts. While on a spree on the 2nd October they got into an altercation,, *242which had been superinduced apparently by some previous difficulty. It seems that Hendricks and another one of the “spree-ers” had been, a…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. State v. HawkinsOregon Supreme Court · 1890
  2. State v. MoreyOregon Supreme Court · 1894
  3. Haynes v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1855
  4. State v. SmithOregon Supreme Court · 1903
  5. Cotton v. StateMississippi Supreme Court · 1872

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Island Teleradio Service, Inc. v. GreenSupreme Court of The Virgin Islands · 1979

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API