Legal Opinion

Copeland v. Vance

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided January 27, 2017No. 11 Civ. 3918 (KBF)PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION & ORDER

KATHERINE B. FORREST, District Judge:'

Plaintiffs John Copeland, Pedro Perez, and Native Leather, Inc. (“Native Leather”) assert an as-applied constitutional challenge to the validity of New York Penal Law §§ 265.00(5) and 265.01(1), which criminalize the possession of gravity knives (the “Gravity Knife Law” or “Gravity Knife Statute”). (See Amended Complaint ¶¶ 59-60, ECF No. 61.) The Gravity Knife Statute defines a gravity knife as “any knife which has a blade which is released from the handle or sheath thereof by the force of gravity or the application of centrifugal force…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. United States v. SalernoSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  2. Hoffman Estates v. Flipside, Hoffman Estates, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
  3. Connally v. General Construction Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
  4. Kolender v. LawsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  5. United States v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 2008

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Copeland v. VanceCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2018
  2. Boelter v. Hearst Communications, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2017
  3. Cracco v. VanceDistrict Court, S.D. Illinois · 2019
  4. Copeland v. VanceCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2018
  5. Fiumano v. United StatesDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2022

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API