Legal Opinion

Copeland v. Vance

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided June 22, 2018No. Docket No. 17-474; August Term, 2017PublishedCited by 52 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Katzmann, Chief Judge:

*107Plaintiffs-appellants John Copeland, Pedro Perez, and Native Leather, Ltd. (collectively, "plaintiffs") appeal from a judgment against them following a bench trial in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York (Forrest, J .). Plaintiffs claim that New York's ban on gravity knives is void for vagueness under the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment as applied to "[k]nives that are designed to resist opening from their folded and closed position," or common folding knives. J. App'x 51. New York law defines a gravity knife as a knife…

2Cases cited45 opinions

  1. United States v. SalernoSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  2. Grayned v. City of RockfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  3. Johnson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2015
  4. Grayned v. City of RockfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  5. Yick Wo v. HopkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1886

40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by52 opinions

  1. Melendez v. City of New YorkCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2021
  2. Faisal Nabin Kashem v. William BarrCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2019
  3. Carolina Youth Action Project v. Alan WilsonCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2023
  4. United States v. Blair CookCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2020
  5. United States v. Ng Lap SengCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2019

47 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API