Copeland v. Vance
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
Katzmann, Chief Judge:
*107Plaintiffs-appellants John Copeland, Pedro Perez, and Native Leather, Ltd. (collectively, "plaintiffs") appeal from a judgment against them following a bench trial in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York (Forrest, J .). Plaintiffs claim that New York's ban on gravity knives is void for vagueness under the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment as applied to "[k]nives that are designed to resist opening from their folded and closed position," or common folding knives. J. App'x 51. New York law defines a gravity knife as a knife…
2Cases cited45 opinions
- United States v. SalernoSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Grayned v. City of RockfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Johnson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2015
- Grayned v. City of RockfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Yick Wo v. HopkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by52 opinions
- Melendez v. City of New YorkCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2021
- Faisal Nabin Kashem v. William BarrCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2019
- Carolina Youth Action Project v. Alan WilsonCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2023
- United States v. Blair CookCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2020
- United States v. Ng Lap SengCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2019
47 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.