State v. Van Matre
Utah Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
DURHAM, Justice:
Defendant appeals from a jury verdict finding him guilty of sexual abuse of a child and sodomy on a child. On appeal, defendant challenges the expert testimony offered by the prosecution. He also claims that the State failed to comply with Utah Code Ann. § 76-5-411 (Supp.1983), 1 challenges that statute’s constitutionality, challenges the constitutionality of the investigatory techniques used by the State, and claims that the evidence upon which the guilty verdict was based was insufficient. We reverse defendant’s convictions and remand for a new trial.
Defendant lived with the…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- State v. KnightUtah Supreme Court · 1987
- State v. VerdeUtah Supreme Court · 1989
- State v. RimmaschUtah Supreme Court · 1989
- State v. FontanaUtah Supreme Court · 1984
- State v. BellUtah Supreme Court · 1988
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- State v. BrownUtah Supreme Court · 1992
- Fernandez v. CookUtah Supreme Court · 1993
- State v. SealeUtah Supreme Court · 1993
- State v. SpanUtah Supreme Court · 1991
- State v. MatsamasUtah Supreme Court · 1991
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.