Legal Opinion

In Re Murray

United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Wisconsin

Decided September 6, 2005No. 19-20597PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Memorandum Decision on U.S. Trustee’s Objection to Debtor’s Attorneys Fees

SUSAN V. KELLEY, Bankruptcy Judge.

Attorneys who represent consumers in bankruptcy cases commonly charge a flat fee for a standard bundle of services. Since legal fees are subject to court approval, “presumptively reasonable fees” or “no-look fees” have developed to save time for the court, trustees and the attorneys who represent debtors. 1 If the attorney for the debtor charges the no-look flat fee for basic services such as pre-bankruptcy consultation, preparation of the bankruptcy schedules, attendance at the meeting…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. In the Matter Of: Peter Francis GeraciCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1998
  2. Schwanz v. TeperWisconsin Supreme Court · 1974
  3. Reichert v. Rex Accessories Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1938
  4. Roche v. Du BoisWisconsin Supreme Court · 1937
  5. Ohio Casualty Ins. Co. v. Holz & Holz, Inc.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1964

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. In Re WilliamsBankruptcy Appellate Panel of the Sixth Circuit · 2007
  2. In re: Dale Williams v.Bankruptcy Appellate Panel of the Sixth Circuit · 2007

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API