Legal Opinion

Steinfeld v. Menager

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided June 11, 1898No. Civil No. 604PublishedCited by 4 opinions

APPEAL from a judgment of the District Court of the First Judicial District in and for the County of Pima. George R. Davis, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtDoan, J.

On the twentieth day of March, 1897, Henry Menager brought suit by attachment against Richard Farrell, in the district court of Pima County, to recover the sum of $2,116.42, with interest. The sheriff made a levy of this writ of attachment in the following manner upon defendant’s cattle of the OIL brand, which were running at large on the *142range. On the day he received the writ he gave notice in his office in Tucson, in the presence of two witnesses, James N. Leevy and A. J. Preston, that he had levied on said cattle. Thereafter, on that date, March 20, 1897, he filed with the county recorder…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Watt v. WrightCalifornia Supreme Court · 1884
  2. Sharp v. BairdCalifornia Supreme Court · 1872

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Beach v. Spokane Ranch & Water Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1901
  2. Valley National Bank v. Educational Credit Bureau, Inc.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1975
  3. Menager v. FarrellArizona Supreme Court · 1899
  4. Williams v. OldenIdaho Supreme Court · 1900

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API