Legal Opinion

Bacon v. Carlin

District Court, D. Kansas

Decided December 21, 1983No. Civ. A. 83-4233PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

LOGAN, Circuit Judge.

Plaintiffs, five qualified Kansas voters, have brought this suit challenging the constitutionality of the present apportionment scheme of the Kansas Senate and House of Representatives. Defendants are the Governor of Kansas, the Secretary of State, the President of the Senate, the Speaker of the House of Representatives, and the chairmen of the House and Senate Committees on Legislative and Congressional Apportionment. The parties argued the case on stipulated facts before this three-judge panel convened pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2284(a).

The Kansas Constitution requires…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Reynolds v. SimsSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  2. Whitcomb v. ChavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  3. Burns v. RichardsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  4. Abate v. MundtSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  5. Sixty-Seventh Minnesota State Senate v. BeensSupreme Court of the United States · 1972

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Opinion No., Arkansas Attorney General Reports1991

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API