Legal Opinion
State v. Hall
Missouri Court of Appeals
Decided May 24, 1988No. 53059PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
KAROHL, Presiding Judge.
Defendants appeal misdemeanor convictions for pursuing deer with the aid of artificial light. The information charges defendants “did unlawfully commit the following offense contrary to the Statutes of the State of Missouri, Section 252.040 RSMo 1978, and/or the rules and regulations of The Missouri Conservation Commission, Rule 3 C.S.R. 10-7.410(B) to wit: Attempt [to] locate wildlife with aid of artificial light with firearm in possession while acting with another.”
Under the first claim of error defendants contend the state was required to prove as a matter of…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- State v. TurnerSupreme Court of Missouri · 1981
- Newson v. City of Kansas CityMissouri Court of Appeals · 1980
- State v. CrowellMissouri Court of Appeals · 1978
- Allen v. State Department of Public Health & WelfareMissouri Court of Appeals · 1972
- Crudup v. Missouri State Division of Family ServicesMissouri Court of Appeals · 1980
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- State of Minnesota v. Roger Benedict SchmidSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2015
- McClellan v. Director of RevenueMissouri Court of Appeals · 1999
- State v. DavisMissouri Court of Appeals · 2001