Legal Opinion

State v. Crowell

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided January 9, 1978No. 10677PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

TITUS, Judge.

Defendant was convicted of first offense operating a motor vehicle while intoxicated [§ 564.440(1)] 1 and appeals.

Defendant’s brief on appeal contains five points relied on. Points 3,4 and 5 are tendered without citation of authority as required by Rule 84.04(d). When this occurs, the points are deemed to have been waived or abandoned. State v. Davis, 556 S.W.2d 745, 747[8] (Mo.App.1977); State v. Halliburton, 531 S.W.2d 554, 556[5] (Mo.App.1975); State v. Schulten, 529 S.W.2d 432, 434[2] (Mo.App.1975). In point numbered 2, defendant complains of the giving of Instruction No. 5.…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. State v. SchultenMissouri Court of Appeals · 1975
  2. State v. MorrowMissouri Court of Appeals · 1976
  3. State v. McClainMissouri Court of Appeals · 1976
  4. State v. RobbinsMissouri Court of Appeals · 1970
  5. State v. SinclairMissouri Court of Appeals · 1971

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Stuhr v. Director of RevenueSupreme Court of Missouri · 1989
  2. Shine v. Director of RevenueMissouri Court of Appeals · 1991
  3. State v. NetzerMissouri Court of Appeals · 1979
  4. State v. MacKMissouri Court of Appeals · 1995
  5. Jannett v. KingMissouri Court of Appeals · 1985

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API