Legal Opinion

Riggins v. State

Court of Special Appeals of Maryland

Decided May 27, 2015No. 1128/13PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtKehoe, J.

Nearly forty years ago, the Court of Appeals held that a defendant in a criminal case has a due process right to inspect prior written statements made by prosecution witnesses that are in possession of the State. Carr v. State, 284 Md. 455, 472-73, 397 A.2d 606 (1979). Two years later, this Court held that this right existed independently of the State’s duties imposed by the criminal discovery rules. Leonard v. State, 46 Md.App. 631, 636-37, 421 A.2d 85 (1980), aff'd, 290 Md. 295, 429 A.2d 538 (1981). This appeal requires us to apply the principles of Carr and related decisions to decide…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. Jencks v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  3. William B. Barbee v. Warden, Maryland PenitentiaryCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1964
  4. Little v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1984
  5. United States v. Cyril T. HannaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Smith v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2017
  2. Winston, Mayhew & Cannon v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2018
  3. Green v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2016

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API