Legal Opinion

Davenport v. Davenport

New Jersey Court of Chancery

Decided November 18, 1924PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Our legislature has provided that desertion, as a ground of divorce, must be willful, continued and obstinate for the statutory period. A wife's desertion, though willful, cannot be adjudged obstinate unless it has resisted such efforts or concessions on the part of her husband as he ought to have made to bring it to an end, under the particular circumstances of the case. This is the established test in this state by a long and harmonious line of decisions. Jennings v. Jennings, 13 N.J. Eq. 38; Cornish v. Cornish, 23 N.J. Eq. 208; Bowlby v.Bowlby, 25 N.J. Eq. 406; affirmed, 25 N.J. Eq. 570;…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Taylor v. TaylorSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1908
  2. Hall v. HallSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1900
  3. Rector v. RectorNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1911
  4. Danielly v. DaniellyNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1922
  5. Fraser v. FraserSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1917

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Holst v. HolstNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1927
  2. Koch v. KochNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1967

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API