Legal Opinion

Philpot v. State

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided July 14, 1966No. 5 Div. 651PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*99 Response to Questions Certified by the Court of Appeals.

2Per curiam

The following is in response to your inquiry as above set out.

Questions A. 1. and A. 2.

A. 1. In Johnson v. New Jersey, No. 762, June 20, 1966, the Supreme Court of the United States declared that the new rules enacted in Miranda v. Arizona, Nos. 759, 760, 761, and 584, June 13, 1966 [384 U.S. 436, 86 S.Ct. 1602, 16 L.Ed.2d 694], *100apply only to cases in which the trial began after June 13, 1966.

We are, therefore, of opinion that in trials begun prior to June 13, 1966, the state is not required to show, as a predicate to the admission of…

3Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. White v. CrookDistrict Court, M.D. Alabama · 1966
  3. Luther Bailey v. Lee Henslee, Superintendent of Arkansas State PenitentiaryCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1959
  4. Hollis v. EllisDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 1961
  5. Blauvelt v. HolmanDistrict Court, M.D. Alabama · 1964

4Cited by4 opinions

  1. Butler v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1970
  2. Beverly v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1967
  3. Spruce v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1966
  4. Taylor v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1967

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API