Legal Opinion

Cobb v. Griffith & Adams Sand, Gravel, & Transportation Co.

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided April 25, 1882PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Appeal from the St. Louis Circuit Court, Boyle, J.

1Opinion of the CourtLewis, P. J.

The plaintiff claims compensation for one hundred thousand cubic yards of sand taken by the defendant from beneath *131the waters of the Mississippi River, on land of which the plaintiff alleges he is the owner, near the Illinois shore. The defendant denies generally, and pleads a license from the true owner, and the statutory limitation of five years. The verdict and judgment were for the defendant.

The controversy has been directed chiefly on both sides, to the merits of a tax-title hel-d by the plaintiff, and to the defendant’s right to attack the same in this proceeding. The laws of Illinois…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. State v. MarshallSupreme Court of Missouri · 1865
  2. Lycoming Fire Insurance v. RubinIllinois Supreme Court · 1875
  3. State v. MixSupreme Court of Missouri · 1851
  4. State v. DaubertSupreme Court of Missouri · 1868
  5. Lafayette, Bloomington & Mississippi Railroad v. WinslowIllinois Supreme Court · 1872

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Meyer v. LewisMissouri Court of Appeals · 1891
  2. Gregory v. New York, Lake Erie & Western RailroadNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1885

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API