Legal Opinion

Meyer v. Lewis

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided January 27, 1891PublishedCited by 8 opinions

Appeal from the St. Louis City Circuit Court. — Hon. James E. Withrow, Judge.

1Opinion of the CourtThompson, J.

This was an action for damages grounded upon negligence. The plaintiff had a verdict and judgment, and the defendant takes the case here by-appeal. The errors which are assigned are, so far as they need be noticed, the following: First. That there was no evidence to take the case to the jury ; second, that the court erred in admitting an item of evidence as to the statement made by the driver of the defendant, against the defendant’s objection.

As to the first assignment of error it is to be observed that the injury, according to the evidence, happened in this way : The defendant was the owner *418…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Stephens v. Hannibal & St. Joseph RailroadSupreme Court of Missouri · 1888
  2. State v. MarshallSupreme Court of Missouri · 1865
  3. Lycoming Fire Insurance v. RubinIllinois Supreme Court · 1875
  4. State v. MixSupreme Court of Missouri · 1851
  5. Furst v. . Second Avenue Railroad CompanyNew York Court of Appeals · 1878

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Fuller v. RobinsonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1910
  2. Moses v. Independence, Mo. K.C. Pub. Serv. Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1945
  3. Wyler v. RaticanMissouri Court of Appeals · 1910
  4. Hanson v. City Light & Traction Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1944
  5. Wengert v. LyonsMissouri Court of Appeals · 1925

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API