Legal Opinion

Save Our Cabinets v. United States Fish & Wildlife Service

District Court, D. Montana

Decided May 30, 2017No. CV 15-69-M-DWMPublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION and ORDER

Donald W. Molloy, United States District Court Judge

Plaintiffs Save Our Cabinets, Earthworks, and Defenders of the Wildlife (collectively “Plaintiffs”) seek declaratory and injunctive relief under the Endangered Species Act .(“ESA”), challenging determinations made by the United States Fish and Wildlife Service (“Fish and Wildlife Service”) and the United States Forest Service (“Forest Service”) (collectively “Federal Defendants”) related to the Mon-tanore Mine Project (the “Project” or “Mine”) in northwestern Montana. Plaintiffs argue that Federal Defendants violated the ESA…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Motor Vehicle Mfrs. Assn. of United States, Inc. v. State Farm Mut. Automobile Ins. Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. Citizens to Preserve Overton Park, Inc. v. VolpeSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  3. Tennessee Valley Authority v. HillSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  4. Baltimore Gas & Electric Co. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
  5. The Lands Council v. McNairCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Defenders of Wildlife v. United States Forest ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2024
  2. Center for Biological Diversity v. United States Forest ServiceDistrict Court, D. Montana · 2023
  3. Ksanka Kupaqa Xa'lcin v. United States Fish and Wildlife ServiceDistrict Court, D. Montana · 2021

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API