Legal Opinion
Langham v. Jackson
Supreme Court of Alabama
Decided June 12, 1924No. 1 Div. 315PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtThomas, J.
The court gave the general affirmative charge at the request of the plaintiff. The instant assignments of error relate to the action of the court in refusing to allow in evidence testimony as to the acts, conduct, and declarations of William B. Powell relating to the taking by the Bank of Bay Minette of the note of defendants and one C. B. Thompson. The suit is by the superintendent of banks on the indorsement by defendants of the note to said bank by said Thompson.
The real defense by the indorsers is that the indorsements were conditional; that the note would be also indorsed by W. D. Owens,…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Syndicate Insurance v. CatchingsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1893
- Robinson & Co. v. GreeneSupreme Court of Alabama · 1906
- Roberts v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1916
- Capital Security Co. v. OwenSupreme Court of Alabama · 1916
- Lytle & Co. v. Bank of DothanSupreme Court of Alabama · 1898
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Alabama Mills, Inc. v. SmithSupreme Court of Alabama · 1939
- Adler v. MillerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1928
- Bardach Iron & Steel Co. v. Charleston Port TerminalsSupreme Court of Virginia · 1925
- Atlanta Life Ins. Co. v. AshSupreme Court of Alabama · 1934
- New York Life Ins. Co. v. SeighmanCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1944
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.