Karmely v. Wertheimer
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
JON O. NEWMAN, Circuit Judge.
This appeal presents the recurring issue of whether relevant documents are ambiguous, precluding their interpretation on a motion to dismiss, but the issue arises in the unusual context of an agreement for a loan from a lender to himself and his partner. A minor though intriguing issue, rarely if ever encountered in a judicial opinion, is whether the character “i” identifying a subparagraph in one of the documents is a lower case letter “i” or a lower case version of a Roman numeral “I,” sometimes referred to as a romanette. 1
Plaintiffs-Appellants Shahab Karmely…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Barnhart v. ThomasSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
- UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Scott Douglas LACY, Defendant-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1997
- Paneccasio v. Unisource Worldwide, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2008
- This is Me, Inc. v. Elizabeth Taylor, Zev Bufman, and Zev Bufman Entertainment, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1998
- Mellon Bank, N.A. v. United Bank Corporation Of New YorkCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1994
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Lenart v. Coach, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2015
- Ross v. AXA Equitable Life InsuranceDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2015
- EscapeX IP LLC v. Block, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2023
- Geller Biopharm, Inc. v. Amunix Pharmaceuticals, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2021
- Guvera IP Pty Ltd. v. Spotify, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2022
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.