Legal Opinion

Karmely v. Wertheimer

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided December 9, 2013No. 12-3781-cvPublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JON O. NEWMAN, Circuit Judge.

This appeal presents the recurring issue of whether relevant documents are ambiguous, precluding their interpretation on a motion to dismiss, but the issue arises in the unusual context of an agreement for a loan from a lender to himself and his partner. A minor though intriguing issue, rarely if ever encountered in a judicial opinion, is whether the character “i” identifying a subparagraph in one of the documents is a lower case letter “i” or a lower case version of a Roman numeral “I,” sometimes referred to as a romanette. 1

Plaintiffs-Appellants Shahab Karmely…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Barnhart v. ThomasSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
  2. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Scott Douglas LACY, Defendant-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1997
  3. Paneccasio v. Unisource Worldwide, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2008
  4. This is Me, Inc. v. Elizabeth Taylor, Zev Bufman, and Zev Bufman Entertainment, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1998
  5. Mellon Bank, N.A. v. United Bank Corporation Of New YorkCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1994

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Lenart v. Coach, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2015
  2. Ross v. AXA Equitable Life InsuranceDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2015
  3. EscapeX IP LLC v. Block, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2023
  4. Geller Biopharm, Inc. v. Amunix Pharmaceuticals, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2021
  5. Guvera IP Pty Ltd. v. Spotify, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2022

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API