Legal Opinion

People v. Frank S.

Criminal Court of the City of New York

Decided January 24, 2000PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Joseph J. Dawson, J.

The defendants in these cases have been charged with public lewdness in violation of section 245.00 (a) of the Penal Law. Defendant Frank S. also has been charged with exposure of a person in violation of section 245.01 of the Penal Law. All three cases involve incidents of sexual conduct that allegedly occurred on subway platforms. All three defendants move to dismiss on the theory that the accusatory instruments are facially insufficient.

The accusatory instruments filed against Frank S. and Miguel R. arise from the same incident. In the information…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. People v. AlejandroNew York Court of Appeals · 1987
  2. People v. McNamaraNew York Court of Appeals · 1991
  3. United States v. DoeDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1995
  4. People v. DavisCriminal Court of the City of New York · 1994
  5. People v. EnsleyCriminal Court of the City of New York · 1999

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. People v. PetersonNassau County District Court · 2015

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API