Legal Opinion

Emerson v. State

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided March 27, 1941No. 6 Div. 829PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FOSTER, Justice.

The statement in the opinion of the Court of Appeals, that in order to review the judgment on motion for a new trial, when the bill of exceptions cannot be considered to review the original judgment, there must be an appeal from the judgment on the motion on the authority of McMillon v. Skelton, 208 Ala. 693, 95 So. 148, is a principle now obsolete.

But at that time Section 6433 of the Code, Code 1940, Tit. 7, § 822, had not been so amended as that a bill of exceptions could preserve for review the rulings on the main trial by presenting the bill within ninety days after the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Richards v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1936
  2. Stallings v. ClarkSupreme Court of Alabama · 1928
  3. J. H. Arnold & Co. v. JordanSupreme Court of Alabama · 1927
  4. McMillon v. SkeltonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1923
  5. Southern Ry. Co. v. Scottsboro Wholesale Co.Alabama Court of Appeals · 1928

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Reeder v. State Ex Rel. MyersSupreme Court of Alabama · 1975
  2. Stain v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1961
  3. Renfroe v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1973
  4. Local 204 of Textile Workers Union of A. v. RichardsonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1943
  5. Dawson v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1952

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API