Smith v. Gooding
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
THREAD GILL, C.-
Defendant in error, hereinafter called plaintiff, commenced this action against plaintiff in error, hereinafter called defendant, on September 14, 1921, by filing a bill of particulars in justice ¡of peace court and causing a summons to be issued and served on defendant. The action was in replevin and the bill of particulars, omitting formal parts, stated as follows:
“Comes now the plaintiff and for cause of action against the defendant above named alleges ana states:
“That plaintiff is the owner of the following described and valued property, to wit; 57 bushels of…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Angell v. EggerNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1897
- Boom v. St. Paul Foundry & Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1885
- St. John v. StandringNew York Supreme Court · 1807
- Ingals v. FergusonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1897
- De Mott v. HagermanNew York Supreme Court · 1828
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Harrell v. Samson Resources Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1998
- Harden v. American-First Nat. Bank of Oklahoma CitySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1931
- United States F. & G. Co. v. State Ex Rel. ShullSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1934
- Burkhart v. RogersSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1928