Legal Opinion

Smith v. Gooding

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided September 16, 1924No. 13896PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

THREAD GILL, C.-

Defendant in error, hereinafter called plaintiff, commenced this action against plaintiff in error, hereinafter called defendant, on September 14, 1921, by filing a bill of particulars in justice ¡of peace court and causing a summons to be issued and served on defendant. The action was in replevin and the bill of particulars, omitting formal parts, stated as follows:

“Comes now the plaintiff and for cause of action against the defendant above named alleges ana states:
“That plaintiff is the owner of the following described and valued property, to wit; 57 bushels of…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Angell v. EggerNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1897
  2. Boom v. St. Paul Foundry & Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1885
  3. St. John v. StandringNew York Supreme Court · 1807
  4. Ingals v. FergusonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1897
  5. De Mott v. HagermanNew York Supreme Court · 1828

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Harrell v. Samson Resources Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1998
  2. Harden v. American-First Nat. Bank of Oklahoma CitySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1931
  3. United States F. & G. Co. v. State Ex Rel. ShullSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1934
  4. Burkhart v. RogersSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1928

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API