Legal Opinion

Boom v. St. Paul Foundry & Manufacturing Co.

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided March 11, 1885PublishedCited by 15 opinions

Appeal by defendant from an order of the district court for Ramsey county refusing a new trial after a trial by Brill, J., without a jury. cited Chambers v. Waters, 7 Cal. 890; Clark v. Norton, 6 Minn. 277, (412;) Petty grove v. Hoyt, 11 Me. 66; Peck v. Wilson, 22 Ill. 205.

1Opinion of the CourtDickinson, J.

In a former action in the nature of replevin, brought by this defendant against this plaintiff, a recovery of the possession of a portable steam-engine was sought. The statutory bond required in such actions was given, the plaintiff (this defendant) being the principal obligor. Upon the proper requisition the property was taken from the defendant, Boom, and delivered to the plaintiff in that action. The cause was tried before the court without a jury, upon an agreed statement of the facts, and upon the pleadings, showing among other things that the plaintiff’s (this defendant’s) right was…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Hall v. SmithSupreme Court of Iowa · 1859
  2. Berghoff v. HeckwolfSupreme Court of Missouri · 1858
  3. Smith v. WhitingMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1868
  4. Persse v. WatrousSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1861
  5. Manning v. ManningSupreme Court of Kansas · 1881

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Thomas v. JoslinSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1886
  2. Andrews v. School-District No. 4Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1886
  3. McElroy v. Board of EducationSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1931
  4. Craver v. ChristianSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1885
  5. Lawlor v. MerrittSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1909

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API