Legal Opinion

Newsom v. Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County

California Supreme Court

Decided September 27, 1928No. Docket No. S.F. 12273PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtShenk, J.

This is a second application to this court for a writ of mandate to compel the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County to submit to the electors of said county, pursuant to the initiative provisions of the constitution and section 4058 of the Political Code, a proposed ordinance, the purpose of which is to grant to the Northern California Development Company, a corporation, a franchise to construct and maintain a toll-bridge across the Straits of Carquinez, which forms the boundary between the county of Contra Costa and the county of Solano. On the first application the writ was denied.…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Dwyer v. City Council of the City of BerkeleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1927
  2. Chase v. KalberCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1915
  3. Galvin v. Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa CountyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1925
  4. Myers v. StringhamCalifornia Supreme Court · 1925
  5. People ex rel. Dean v. Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa CountyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Hurst v. City of BurlingameCalifornia Supreme Court · 1929
  2. Simpson v. HiteCalifornia Supreme Court · 1950
  3. Dewey v. Doxey-Layton Realty Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1954
  4. American Toll Bridge Co. v. Railroad CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1938
  5. Baum v. City of St. LouisSupreme Court of Missouri · 1938

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API