Legal Opinion

Boling v. Miller

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided February 17, 1893No. 16,155PublishedCited by 9 opinions

Erom the Rush. Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtOlds, J.

The controversy in this case grows out of the construction to be given to the 4th item of the will of Clemuel Boling, deceased. The item reads as follows :

“ I further will and direct that at the death of my wife the whole of my estate be divided into three equal shares, and I give and devise one of such shares to my son, George L. Boling, and one share to my daughter' Sarah M. Morris, and one share to my grandson Clemuel N. Boling provided he attains the age of twenty-one years. Should my *603grandson die without issue, then I will and direct that the share he would have received shall he divided…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Davidson v. KoehlerIndiana Supreme Court · 1881
  2. Daugherty v. RogersIndiana Supreme Court · 1889
  3. Harris v. CarpenterIndiana Supreme Court · 1887
  4. Davidson v. BatesIndiana Supreme Court · 1887
  5. Jones v. MillerIndiana Supreme Court · 1859

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Aldred v. SylvesterIndiana Supreme Court · 1916
  2. Ball v. PhelanMississippi Supreme Court · 1908
  3. Myers v. CarneyIndiana Supreme Court · 1908
  4. Corey v. SpringerIndiana Supreme Court · 1894
  5. Tindall v. MillerIndiana Supreme Court · 1895

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API