Legal Opinion
Tindall v. Miller
Indiana Supreme Court
Decided October 12, 1895No. 17,213PublishedCited by 13 opinions
From the Fayette Circuit Court. .
1Opinion of the CourtHoward, C. J.
By his last will Luther Hutchinson-divided his property between his wife, Sarah Hutchinson, and his daughter, Julia Elliott. The real estate here in controversy was devised as follows:
“Third. I give and bequeath to my beloved wife, Sarah, the east half of my present dwelling house and *338lot (describing the- property) so long as she may live. She shall have the exclusive use and profits of said property, with the appurtenances thereto belonging, and at the death of my said wife'the above described property shall pass absolute to my daughter Julia, if she still survive. If she shall be deceased,…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Harris v. CarpenterIndiana Supreme Court · 1887
- Davidson v. BatesIndiana Supreme Court · 1887
- Doren v. GillumIndiana Supreme Court · 1894
- Corey v. SpringerIndiana Supreme Court · 1894
- Amos v. AmosIndiana Supreme Court · 1889
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Aldred v. SylvesterIndiana Supreme Court · 1916
- Alsman v. WaltersIndiana Supreme Court · 1914
- Taylor v. StephensIndiana Supreme Court · 1905
- Myers v. CarneyIndiana Supreme Court · 1908
- Moores v. HareIndiana Supreme Court · 1896
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.