Legal Opinion

Texans Against Censorship v. State Bar of Texas

District Court, E.D. Texas

Decided March 31, 1995No. 3:94 cv 61PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

JUSTICE, District Judge.

I. Introduction

This civil action, brought pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983, presents many complicated and thorny issues concerning whether regulations which restrict the manner in which lawyers licensed to practice law in Texas may advertise their services, or otherwise solicit business, abridge, inter alia, the right to freedom of expression under the First Amendment. The Supreme Court of Texas recently promulgated these regulations as amendments to the Texas Disciplinary Rules of Professional Conduct, and they are scheduled to become effective on April…

2Cases cited58 opinions

  1. Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  2. New York Times Co. v. SullivanSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  3. Allen v. WrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  4. Valley Forge Christian College v. Americans United for Separation of Church and State, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
  5. Grayned v. City of RockfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1972

53 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. American Libraries Ass'n v. PatakiDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1997
  2. Rodgers v. Commission for Lawyer DisciplineCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2004
  3. Falanga v. State Bar of GeorgiaCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1998
  4. Lawyer Disciplinary Board v. AllenWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1996
  5. Iowa Supreme Court Board of Professional Ethics & Conduct v. WherrySupreme Court of Iowa · 1997

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API