Legal Opinion

Romeka v. RadAmerica II, LLC

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided August 30, 2023No. 16/22PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Bridget Romeka v. RadAmerica II, LLC, et al., No. 16, September Term, 2022. Opinion by Gould, J. HEALTH CARE WORKER WHISTLEBLOWER PROTECTION ACT – CAUSATION The Supreme Court of Maryland held that to prevail under the Health Care Worker Whistleblower Protection Act, a plaintiff (1) must prove that but for the protected disclosure, the employer would not have taken the adverse personnel action, and (2) may establish but-for causation through the analytical framework established in McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. Green,

411 U.S. 792

(1973). HEALTH CARE WORKER WHISTLEBLOWER PROTECTION ACT – SUMMARY…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  2. University of Tex. Southwestern Medical Center v. NassarSupreme Court of the United States · 2013
  3. Foster v. University of Maryland-Eastern ShoreCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2015
  4. William Price v. Tommy G. Thompson, Secretary, United States Department of Health and Human ServicesCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2004
  5. Barbre v. PopeCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2007

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Cutchember v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2026
  2. In re: J.B.Court of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2024
  3. Kelly v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2024

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API