Romeka v. RadAmerica II, LLC
Court of Appeals of Maryland
1Opinion of the Court
Bridget Romeka v. RadAmerica II, LLC, et al., No. 16, September Term, 2022. Opinion by Gould, J. HEALTH CARE WORKER WHISTLEBLOWER PROTECTION ACT – CAUSATION The Supreme Court of Maryland held that to prevail under the Health Care Worker Whistleblower Protection Act, a plaintiff (1) must prove that but for the protected disclosure, the employer would not have taken the adverse personnel action, and (2) may establish but-for causation through the analytical framework established in McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. Green,
411 U.S. 792
(1973). HEALTH CARE WORKER WHISTLEBLOWER PROTECTION ACT – SUMMARY…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- University of Tex. Southwestern Medical Center v. NassarSupreme Court of the United States · 2013
- Foster v. University of Maryland-Eastern ShoreCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2015
- William Price v. Tommy G. Thompson, Secretary, United States Department of Health and Human ServicesCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2004
- Barbre v. PopeCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2007
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Cutchember v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2026
- In re: J.B.Court of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2024
- Kelly v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2024