Legal Opinion · Dissent

L.E.S. v. C.D.M.

Utah Supreme Court

Decided December 6, 2016No. 20140966Published

1Dissent

Associate Chief Justice Lee,

dissenting:

¶45 Parental-rights termination cases are heart-wrenching. They present problems of enormous consequence—of severance of one of the most cherished of all human bonds, with .the safety and welfare of children hanging in the balance. This is a matter on which our sensitivity for justice is heightened. And for that reason I can appreciate a desire to find a way to secure the. appointment of counsel in a case like this one. As a pure policy matter, I see significant upsides in assuring that a parent has the benefit of legal counsel before his legal rights…

2Cases cited63 opinions

  1. Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. Lassiter v. Department of Social Servs. of Durham Cty.Supreme Court of the United States · 1981
  3. Hurtado v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
  4. Betts v. BradySupreme Court of the United States · 1942
  5. Den Ex Dem. Murray v. Hoboken Land & Improvement Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1856

58 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API