L.E.S. v. C.D.M.
Utah Supreme Court
1Dissent
Associate Chief Justice Lee,
dissenting:
¶45 Parental-rights termination cases are heart-wrenching. They present problems of enormous consequence—of severance of one of the most cherished of all human bonds, with .the safety and welfare of children hanging in the balance. This is a matter on which our sensitivity for justice is heightened. And for that reason I can appreciate a desire to find a way to secure the. appointment of counsel in a case like this one. As a pure policy matter, I see significant upsides in assuring that a parent has the benefit of legal counsel before his legal rights…
2Cases cited63 opinions
- Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Lassiter v. Department of Social Servs. of Durham Cty.Supreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Hurtado v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
- Betts v. BradySupreme Court of the United States · 1942
- Den Ex Dem. Murray v. Hoboken Land & Improvement Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1856
58 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.