Legal Opinion

Palmer House Co. v. Industrial Commission

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided November 22, 1944No. 28046. Judgment reversed; award set asidePublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Stone

The question involved in this case concerns the liability of plaintiff in error to pay to defendant in error, Charles R. Miller, compensation under the Occupational Diseases Act. Miller, a painter for 45 years, entered the employ of plaintiff in error on May 6, 1942, working twenty-two days. Later he worked from July 3, 1942, to July 31, 1942, when he was laid off because of lack of work, and told to return early in December. He was working at what was known as one-half-scale wages through a dispensation allowed by his union. Plaintiff in error paid him $34.50 per week. He had, in the January…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Kensington Steel Corp. v. Industrial CommissionIllinois Supreme Court · 1944
  2. Liberty Foundries Co. v. Industrial CommissionIllinois Supreme Court · 1940
  3. Northwestern Yeast Co. v. Industrial CommissionIllinois Supreme Court · 1941
  4. Ward v. CaverlyIllinois Supreme Court · 1916
  5. Fels v. ArendsIllinois Supreme Court · 1927

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Dur-Ite Company v. Industrial CommissionIllinois Supreme Court · 1946
  2. People v. LucenteIllinois Supreme Court · 1987
  3. People v. LucenteIllinois Supreme Court · 1987
  4. People v. WadeIllinois Supreme Court · 1987
  5. People v. WadeIllinois Supreme Court · 1987

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API