Dur-Ite Company v. Industrial Commission
Illinois Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Wilson
Frank Holmes filed an application for the adjustment of compensation with the Industrial Commission, charging that on or about March 31, 1938, he became permanently disabled from the occupational disease of silicosis at Martinez, California, and that, at the time of his disablement, he was engaged in repairing a tunnel. The arbitrator found that the Industrial Commission was without jurisdiction since the last exposure to the hazards of an occupational disease took place in the State of California, and not in this State. The record could not be completed owing to the death of the court…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Liberty Foundries Co. v. Industrial CommissionIllinois Supreme Court · 1940
- Beall Bros. Supply Co. v. Industrial CommissionIllinois Supreme Court · 1930
- Union Bridge & Construction Co. v. Industrial CommissionIllinois Supreme Court · 1919
- Central Pattern & Foundry Co. v. Industrial CommissionIllinois Supreme Court · 1940
- Ferguson & Lange Foundries, Inc. v. Industrial CommissionIllinois Supreme Court · 1942
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by44 opinions
- Avery v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceIllinois Supreme Court · 2005
- Diamond Multimedia Systems, Inc. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1999
- Nimesh Patel v. Facebook, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2019
- Graham v. General U.S. Grant Post No. 2665Illinois Supreme Court · 1969
- Handley v. Unarco Industries, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1984
39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.