Legal Opinion

Dur-Ite Company v. Industrial Commission

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided September 18, 1946No. 29459. Reversed and remandedPublishedCited by 44 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Wilson

Frank Holmes filed an application for the adjustment of compensation with the Industrial Commission, charging that on or about March 31, 1938, he became permanently disabled from the occupational disease of silicosis at Martinez, California, and that, at the time of his disablement, he was engaged in repairing a tunnel. The arbitrator found that the Industrial Commission was without jurisdiction since the last exposure to the hazards of an occupational disease took place in the State of California, and not in this State. The record could not be completed owing to the death of the court…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Liberty Foundries Co. v. Industrial CommissionIllinois Supreme Court · 1940
  2. Beall Bros. Supply Co. v. Industrial CommissionIllinois Supreme Court · 1930
  3. Union Bridge & Construction Co. v. Industrial CommissionIllinois Supreme Court · 1919
  4. Central Pattern & Foundry Co. v. Industrial CommissionIllinois Supreme Court · 1940
  5. Ferguson & Lange Foundries, Inc. v. Industrial CommissionIllinois Supreme Court · 1942

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by44 opinions

  1. Avery v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceIllinois Supreme Court · 2005
  2. Diamond Multimedia Systems, Inc. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1999
  3. Nimesh Patel v. Facebook, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2019
  4. Graham v. General U.S. Grant Post No. 2665Illinois Supreme Court · 1969
  5. Handley v. Unarco Industries, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1984

39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API