Legal Opinion

Bombarger v. Bloss

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided November 20, 1945No. 31917PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Per curiam

There is involved in this appeal title to a one-sixteenth undivided interest in the oil and gas rights in and to the N. % of the S. W. Vi of section 36, township 12 N., range 9 E., Okfuskee county. The above tract originally constituted the allotment of Jack Johnson, a Creek Freedman. He afterwards conveyed the premises to Drucilla B. Bombarger. On the 24th day of December, 1919, Mrs. Bombar-ger, joined by her husband, conveyed said premises, together with the S. % of the S. W. Vi of said section, to C. M. Bloss, reserving, however, one-sixteenth interest in and to all the oil and gas rights.…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Douglas v. DouglasSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1936
  2. Allen v. KinnibrughSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923
  3. Critchlow v. BaconSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1930
  4. Brockman v. HardwickSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1930

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Lincoln v. WellsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1960
  2. Webster v. WebbSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1957

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API