Legal Opinion

(PC) Washington v. Newsome

District Court, E.D. California

Decided November 17, 2021No. 1:21-cv-00840Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 FRANKIE K. WASHINGTON, ) Case No. 1:21-cv-00840-SAB (PC) ) 12 Plaintiff, ) ) ORDER DIRECTING CLERK OF COURT TO 13 v. ) RANDOMLY ASSIGN A DISTRICT JUDGE TO THIS ACTION 14 G. NEWSOME, ) ) FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 15 Defendant. ) RECOMMENDING DISMISSAL OF ACTION ) 16 ) (ECF Nos. 10, 11) ) 17 ) 18 Plaintiff Frankie K. Washington is proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights 19 action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. This matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge 20 pursuant to 28…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Farmer v. BrennanSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  4. Will v. Michigan Department of State PoliceSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  5. Jones v. BockSupreme Court of the United States · 2007

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API