Legal Opinion

In re Timofai Sanitation Co.

New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division

Decided December 27, 1991PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

KING, P.J.A.D.

This case involves a discovery dispute which resulted in the imposition of a $4,300 sanction, representing costs, expenses and attorneys’ fees, by an administrative law judge against the appellant law firm, Thatcher & Lanza. The appellant raises these issues: (1) the AU exceeded her authority in imposing compensatory monetary sanctions on the law firm; (2) the motion for sanctions was procedurally defective and the AU’s order improper; (3) the calculation of the sanction of $4,300 was erroneous.

This matter began when the Board of Public…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Chambers v. Nasco, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991
  2. City of Hackensack v. WinnerSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1980
  3. In Re the Appeal of Certain Sections of the Uniform Administrative Procedure RulesSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1982
  4. Oliviero v. Porter Hayden Co.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1990
  5. Maurio v. Mereck Construction Co., Inc.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1978

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Summit Trust Co. v. BaxtNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2000
  2. Pontidis v. ShavelliNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1997
  3. Chavez v. State Workers' Compensation Admin.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 2012

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API