Legal Opinion

Oliviero v. Porter Hayden Co.

New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division

Decided June 1, 1990PublishedCited by 31 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

241 N.J. Super. 381 (1990)

575 A.2d 50

RALPH L. OLIVIERO AND MARIE OLIVIERO, PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS,

v.

PORTER HAYDEN COMPANY, AS SUCCESSOR TO REID HAYDEN CO.; EAGLE PICHER INDUSTRIES, INC., DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Argued February 27, 1990.

Decided June 1, 1990.

Before Judges DEIGHAN and BROCHIN.

Philip A. Tortoreti argued the cause for appellants (Garruto, Galex & Cantor, attorneys; James B. Cantor on the brief).

John C. Garde argued the cause for respondent Porter Hayden Company (McCarter & English, attorneys; Michael A. Tanenbaum, of Counsel; Thomas…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. State, Dept. of Environ. Protect. v. Ventron Corp.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1983
  2. Busik v. LevineSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1973
  3. Right to Choose v. ByrneSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1982
  4. Evtush v. the Hudson Bus Transportation Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1951
  5. Fortugno Realty Co. v. Schiavone-Bonomo Corp.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1963

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by31 opinions

  1. Abtrax Pharmaceuticals, Inc. v. Elkins-Sinn, Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1995
  2. In Re Estate of LashSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2001
  3. Jugan v. FriedmanNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1994
  4. State v. WilliamsSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2005
  5. Brun v. CardosoNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2006

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API