Legal Opinion

Lindsay Land & Livestock Co. v. Smart Land & Livestock Co.

Utah Supreme Court

Decided November 24, 1913No. 2518PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Appeal from District Court, Second District; Hon. N. J. Harris, Judge. Action by Lindsay Land & Livestock Company against tbe Smart Land and Livestock Company. Judgment for plaintiff. Defendant appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtFrick, J.

In January, 1912, tbe respondent, a corporation, commenced tbis action against tbe Smart Land & Livestock Company, a corporation, and also against one Tbomas Smart. Tbe action was commenced to recover damages to respondent’s sbeep’, which, it is alleged, were caused by tbe defendant’s driving their sbeep and commingling them with tbe sheep of respondent after tbe defendants knew that their sbeep were afflicted with a contagious and infectious disease, thereby causing respondent’s sbeep also to become affected with said disease, by reason of which it was compelled to dip said sheep1, after…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. James v. RobertsonUtah Supreme Court · 1911
  2. Mangum v. Bullion, Beck & Champion Mining Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1897
  3. Farnsworth v. Union Pac. Coal Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1907
  4. Groot v. Oregon Short Line R.Utah Supreme Court · 1908
  5. Genter v. Conglomerate Mining Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1901

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. In Re Richard's EstateUtah Supreme Court · 1956
  2. Berg v. Otis Elevator Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1924
  3. State v. TharpIdaho Supreme Court · 1930
  4. O'Gorman v. Utah Realty & Construction Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1942
  5. Howell v. ParkerUtah Supreme Court · 1956

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API